Impact of Physical Exercising on Convergent and Divergent Thinking

Question: Discuss about theImpact of Physical Exercising on Convergent and Divergent Thinking. Answer: Psychology The following document on psychology focuses on information on psychology, the problem under investigation, participants and their characteristics, methods of experimental that were used, the key findings, conclusion and implications. Psychology is the scientific study of behaviour of living things and their mental cognitive state. Behaviour study deals with the physical expression including the reactions and the actions including their talking, facial expressions and how they move. In mental cognitive state, it explains on the internal state of an individual by the way they think, how they feel and their ability to remember. The environmental aspect explains how the individual reacts to external stimuli. The Impact of Physical Exercising on Convergent and Divergent Thinking Among Athlethes and Non-Athletes. Articles imply that are creative individuals use the movement of their bodies to avoid their mental challenges. Studies have implied that use of physical exercises do to some extent enable creativity. The study sought to find out whether the creativeness of an individual in convergent thinking and divergent was deterred by physical activities whether moderation and vigorous both in non-athletes and athletes. Both groups were affected by the physical exercises. In cognitive, the impact required much cognitive regulation. The non-athletes performance was marred while the athletes denoted importance of the exercise. Divergent thinking implies that the individuals allowed many new ideas to be fathered. This was done by brainstorming and it enabled generation of multiple ideas on a particular issue. Alternatively they could be presented with an object and told to generate many uses of the object. Guilfods (1967). Convergent thinking also functions in generation a single answer to a specified need. Colzato et al (2012) described the individuals required a firm top to bottom regulator as they implied a stiffened search of an individual item. This differed with the divergent as they banked on a loose search that could lead to get an item that could meet the set criterion. Participants Comprised of ninety six healthy individuals from Dutch 48 males and 48 females. Out of the 96, 48 were athletes with a mean age of 20.6 and the body mass indexs mean was 22.3. The non-athletes comprised of 48 members with a mean age of 20.7 and the body mass index was 22.2. Athletes were people who exercised thrice a week for a period more than two years and those who were not athletes if they never exercised more than once in a week. Convergent Thinking Experiment The correspondents were issued with three words that were not related (time, hair and stretch). They were required to get a similar association between the three which was (long). This was made up of 30 previously confirmed factors (Akbari Chermahini et al., 2012). In divergent thinking, the respondents were required to give several possible utilizations of common items such as a pen, table and a bottle. The results were scored using flexibility with the number with of the different classification being the most consistent. AkbariChermahini and Hommel,2010). FINDINGS. The thinking in convergent showed there was an association between the individuals and the scores, it also showed that athletes performed better compared to their counterparts in the moderate by 4.1 and 4.2 in the intense. In divergent thinking, flexibility produced a greater impact on the challenge as they showed a better flexibility in a relaxed state at 7.4 and 6.7 in intense. The probability was 0.011. Conclusion and Implications. The non-athletes never benefited from the acute exercising making their performance to be lower in creativity. This shows that the results were not affected by multi-tasking. The athletes had a significance in acute exercise while in the convergent state. This lead to speculations that the athletes benefited from the exercise as compared to the non-athletes. References Akbari Chermahini, S., and Hommel, B. (2010). The (b) link between creativity and dopamine: spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking.Cognition Akbari Chermahini, S., Hickendorff, M., and Hommel, B. (2012). Development and validity of a Dutch version of the Remote Associates Task: Think. Skills Creat.. Colzato, L. S., Ozturk, A., and Hommel, B. (2012). Meditate to create: the impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Guilford, J. P. (1967).The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.